Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizI.G. Farben and Exxon, re-visited
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
Standard Oil and I.G. Farben: patents and antitrust ], the interrelationship of I.G. Farben and Standard Oil of New Jersey [now ExxonMobil] was discussed.
GoogleBooks has an excerpt from Antitrust and the formation of the postwar world by Wyatt C. Wells, which has text of relevance to the patent and licensing issues presented by the deal related to buna rubber.
Keep in mind, as became evident in the discussion of the CIPRO/anthrax business of a few years ago, the US government can practice, without permission, the claims of patents. The relevant statute goes back to World War I, and was in effect during World War II. Since the relevant information about synthetic rubber was in a patent, it was known. Much of what was discussed in the Truman committee was political grandstanding, rather than a substantive issue. The patents, at all relevant times, were known, and the right to use them existed.
***Separately
Full post as published by IPBiz on August 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Exxon says plaintiffs not entitled to interest
Exxon Uninterested in Interest
Exxon to Bear Its Own Costs in Punitive Damages Case
Exxon, Punitive Damages, and Employment Cases
What's So Weird About the Exxon Decision
SCOTUS hears lengthy argument on Exxon Valdez punitives







