Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentW.D.Okla.: Entry to look for gun was without a warrant or exigent circumstances, and consent was coerced
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Police came to defendant's apartment after being called about an alleged rape there where the victim said that he had an AK-47 in the apartment. The police responded in force, beat on the door, and demanded entry. Defendant called 911 scared that the police would come in and shoot him. The 911 operator and the police at the door kept demanding entry so he let them in, and the gun was found. The entry was warrantless and without exigent circumstances. United States v. Henderson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65918 (W.D. Okla. July 29, 2009):
Based on the facts established at the hearing and the totality of the circumstances, the court concludes that while Mr. Henderson did consent to the search of his apartment, his consent was not voluntary within the meaning of Schneckloth...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on August 03, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Lawsuits and Settlements
T-Mobile USA
alleging the company charged customers for services without their consent.
Facebook / Blockbuster
alleging that Facebook distributed your Blockbuster movie rental information without your knowledge or consent.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Exigent Circumstances Justify Warrantless Entry
Exigent Circumstances Don't Save Warrantless Search of Home
No exigent circumstances [NOT FINAL]
People v. Rogers (Cal. Supreme Court - July 6, 2009)
Ninth Circuit Holds No Warrant Required in Armed Standoff








