Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Sacramento Injury Lawyer BlogSacramento-Area Woman Shows Reprehensible Conduct By Tobacco Company, Part 2 of 7
By Moseley Collins, Esq.
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of this wrongful death case and its proceedings.)
1. State Farm v. Campbell
The first case to explicitly discuss the use of other acts evidence for purposes of assessing reprehensibility in punitive damages trials was the United States Supreme Court's decision in State Farm. That case was a suit against an insurance company brought by one of its former policyholders for bad-faith failure to settle a personal-injury claim against the policyholder.
The jury found for the plaintiff on compensatory liability and damages. During the punitive phase, State Farm defended by asserting that its initial refusal to settle was an honest mistake. The plaintiff countered by introducing evidence showing that State Farm had a policy of stonewalling in cases like his: the plaintiff alleged that for 20 years, State Farm had engaged in a national scheme to meet corporate fiscal goals by capping payouts on claims company wide. (538 U.S. at 415.) Over State Farm's objections, the trial judge allowed this evidence so that the jury could determine whether State Farm's conduct in the Campbell case was indeed intentional and sufficiently egregious to warrant punitive damages - i.e., because the court thought it bore on the reprehensibility of State Farm's conduct toward the Campbells. Id. The jury evidently believed that State Farm's conduct was reprehensible: it returned a $145 million punitive damages award.
After several levels of appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certioriari and vacated the punitive award. The Court did not question the jury's evident conclusion that State Farm's corporate practices were reprehensible, but it held that the Constitution does not permit juries to use punitive damages awards in individual lawsuits to punish nationwide behavior directed at large groups of theoretical plaintiffs.
Full post as published by Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog on July 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Smokeless Tobacco Increases Risk of Stroke and Heart Attack
Smokeless Tobacco Increases Risk of Stroke and Heart Attack
Philip Morris
Jury Decides Against Big Tobacco
BPA
New Study Shows Link to Diabetes and Heart Disease
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Facing Potential Class Action
Hazardous Chemical Spill
500 Evacuated from Denver Area Hospital

R.J. Reynolds Ordered to Pay Damages to Widow
9,500 Shuttered Stores In Sacramento Area: "Everyone Perfectly Content With Less"
Scruggs Gets 5 Years in Prison; Judge Calls Conduct Reprehensible
Important Inequitable Conduct Decision: Defendant Must Prove its Case
Tobacco company ordered to pay attorney's fees for vexatious trademark infringement lawsuit
Tobacco bans change social norms for kids
Sacramento California Attorney Gary Appelblatt Arrested, Charged With Sexual Battery








