Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA10 finds GFE to Gant
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Tenth Circuit today found a good faith exception to Arizona v. Gant. United States v. McKane, 08-6235 (10th Cir. July 28, 2009). The settled law [albeit wrong?] pre-Gant is a sufficient basis for the good faith exception to apply:
Two inseparable principles have emerged from the Supreme Court cases and each builds upon the underlying purpose of the exclusionary rule: deterrence. First, the exclusionary rule seeks to deter objectively unreasonable police conduct, i.e., conduct which an officer knows or should know violates the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., Herring, 129 S. Ct. at 701-04; Krull, 480 U.S. at 348-49.
Second, the purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter misconduct by law enforcement officers, not other entities, and even if it was appropriate to consider the deterrent effect of the exclusionary rule on other institutions, there would be no significant deterrent effect in excluding evidence based upon the mistakes of those uninvolved in or attenuated from law enforcement...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on July 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

SCOTUSwiki Preview: Arizona v. Gant
The Holding of Gant, and Some Initial Questions as To Its Application::
Does Arizona v. Gant Extend Beyond Passenger Compartments:
Arizona v. Gant: A Bright-Line Too Far
More on Arizona v. Gant and the Other Footnote Four








