Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Misleading Advertising LawAOB Commerce Ponzi
Image via Wikipedia
From the SEC Press Release on the AOB Commerce Ponzi:
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a civil injunctive action against Darryl Lamonth Clark in the Northern District of California for his participation in a fraudulent ponzi-like scheme perpetrated by Terchi "Nelson" Liao and two entities Liao controlled, AOB Commerce, Inc. and AOB Asia Fund I, LLC (collectively, "AOB").
The SEC alleges that AOB and several related entities raised more than $45 million from hundreds of investors in several states from mid-2004 to July 2007, through the unregistered offering and sale of promissory notes that in many cases paid interest of up to 5.5% per month.
The SEC's complaint alleges that, although AOB purported to be in the business of making loans to companies in Asia, investor proceeds were used primarily to pay principal and interest on the notes, pay commissions to sales agents, and make undisclosed loans to entities affiliated with AOB.
The Commission brought the scheme to a halt in July 2007, with the filing of an emergency action and the appointment of a receiver. [SEC v. AOB Commerce, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. CV-07-4507 CAS (JCx) (C.D. Cal. filed July 12, 2007)].
The SEC alleges that Clark became an AOB sales agent in July 2004, and that he managed AOB's San Jose, California branch office.
The SEC further alleges that Clark failed to conduct adequate due diligence, helped create a misleading brochure given to investors, and failed to register or become associated with a registered broker-dealer at the time that he participated in the sale of notes.
The SEC also alleges that Clark received payments totaling at least $800,000 from AOB during this time period.
If you want me to follow this case, drop me an email and I will put up the Court documents.
Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on July 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Wesley A. Snyder et al.
alleging the consultants perpetrated a Ponzi scheme by encouraging borrowers to lend more than they needed.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
CIBC
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.

Spotting a Ponzi scheme or investment scam
Our Ponzi Nation: Is Florida the Capital
Madoff: the biggest ever Ponzi scheme
Will Ponzi schemes now be known as Madoff schemes
SEC Goes After Another Ponzi Scheme









