ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyer

New Safety Guidelines Implemented After Muni Accident

By Claude Wyle

ADVERTISEMENTS

Many people have been injured or killed in public transit accidents over the last four months. The most current incident is last week's crash here in San Francisco, in which nearly fifty people were injured. In the wake of this accident, Muni operators have implemented new measures designed to protect the public. Drivers will no longer be able to switch trains from automatic to manual control without permission of a dispatcher. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority said that it had seen no 'impact on service,' since implementation of the new regulations. Well, it would be odd if they had, as it has been in effect for less than three days.

Strangely, these new measures are oddly reminiscent of the old safety measures. These are the same measures that the management of Muni has already declined to enforce. Some, notably Irwin Lum, head of the union which represents drivers of Muni light rail trains, have suggested that the operators of the Muni disregarded these rules as a matter of course. Lum maintains that these new rules are being circulated largely to make it appear that Henry Gray, the driver of the L train involved in Saturday's accident, had done something wrong.

The management of the Muni system are operating a common carrier. This means that they are required to take the highest level of care to ensure the safety of the riding public. This is as it should be. If in fact management has, for 'the past three or four years' been allowing drivers to decide when to change from automatic to manual control, then they, and not the driver in this incident, are responsible for the injured passengers. Moreover, they should not be able to escape that responsibility simply by implementing 'new' cosmetic reforms which are little more than those they already had in place but declined to enforce.

Clearly the pressure is on operators of public transit systems to ensure that these incidents stop. Over the past year more than thirty people have been killed and more than 150 injured in a cross-continental series of crashes. The public demands safer transit. What the public doesn't want is for these issues to be swept back under the rug by a series of management decisions which in essence change nothing. These 'new' policies appear to be little more than old wine in new bottles. We are entitled to better.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Claude Wyle

Full post as published by San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyer on July 24, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0138 secs (new cache)