Academic

Boyce on Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendment

By Lawrence Solum

Bret Boyce (University of Detroit Mercy - School of Law) has posted Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendment on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

In recent years, constitutional scholars have deployed originalist arguments both to attack and to defend the vast twentieth-century expansion of constitutional civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Remarkably, few of these scholars have attempted a coherent justification of originalism itself. The radically different results that these scholars have reached highlight the indeterminacy of the historical record, which does not permit satisfactory answers to the crucial questions of modern equal protection and due process jurisprudence. The article concludes that the currently dominant common-law approach to constitutional adjudication provides far broader and more determinate protection than originalism for individual rights and democratic institutions.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on July 21, 2009 (boomark / email).