Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Underdog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: UnderdogLimit junk science testimony.
By Marks & Katz, LLC
ADVERTISEMENTS
Too many trial judges allow pseudo-expert cops to testify as expert witnesses on such topics as illegal drug sales and gang activity. Here is a Second Circuit case that at least puts brakes on testimony that masquerades as coming from the expert realm, but instead tries to introduce factual allegations that would not come in without expert testimony and that cannot come into evidence with expert testimony, either. U.S. v. Mejia, _ F.3d _ (2d Cir. 2008), http://bit.ly/knujt . Thanks to a criminal defense listserv member for posting this case. Full post as published by Underdog on July 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Junk Faxes Class Action Settlement
$1.8 million Awarded
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental Science
Should the USEPA have a Help Wanted List Rather than a Most Wanted List
The Blogosphere Reacts to the NAS's Report on Junk Science in the Courtroom
JUNK DNA: Not actually junk. Now researchers from Princeton University and Indiana University w
Did Texas execute an innocent man over junk arson science








