ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Prawfs

Leib v. Gerken/Elmendorf on Electoral Reform Design: 4 years later

By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel

ADVERTISEMENTS

About 4 years ago, I went back and forth here and on Balkinization with Heather Gerken (Yale) and Chris Elmendorf (UC Davis) about Canada's innovative approach to electoral reform: the Citizens' Assembly.  Canada gathered together a group of lay citizens to deliberate about a new electoral system for British Columbia.  But the BC Citizens' Assembly has a two-tier system: whatever the lay citizens decide after their year of deliberations has to be submitted to the voters for referendum approval.  In 2005, the voters rejected the electoral reform proposed by the Citizens' Assembly: it needed a supermajority of 60% to pass but achieved only a 57% approval vote.  Most recently, in a new referendum on the Citizens' Assembly proposal, only 38% of the voters agreed with the result the deliberative body preferred.  Some analysis of the new vote in BC can be found here and here.

In 2005, I emphasized that these two-tiered reform systems (deliberative bodies then mass democracy) are quite counterproductive because they invite back in at the second stage all the pathologies of mass democracy that you are precisely seeking to avoid by handing over decision-making power to the deliberative body.  Of course, the advantage of the two-tiered system is making sure lay citizens who have no direct political accountability and may not be representative are constrained in some way.  But Canada's experience tells us that this probably ain't the way to do it (and California's new Prop 11 Citizens' Redistricting Commission, for all its faults, isn't following Canada's lead here).  It seems that citizens will take their cues from partisans with their own interests rather than from their fellow citizens who spent the time trying to perfect their election system.

Still, a two-tiered method might work if the citizens are at the back-end making the actual policy and the agenda-setters themselves have political accountability and representation going for them.  Stay tuned for more on that, since Chris and I are working on such a design.

Full post as published by Prawfs on July 10, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0261 secs (new cache)