Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsLeib v. Gerken/Elmendorf on Electoral Reform Design: 4 years later
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
About 4 years ago, I went back and forth here and on Balkinization with Heather Gerken (Yale) and Chris Elmendorf (UC Davis) about Canada's innovative approach to electoral reform: the Citizens' Assembly. Canada gathered together a group of lay citizens to deliberate about a new electoral system for British Columbia. But the BC Citizens' Assembly has a two-tier system: whatever the lay citizens decide after their year of deliberations has to be submitted to the voters for referendum approval. In 2005, the voters rejected the electoral reform proposed by the Citizens' Assembly: it needed a supermajority of 60% to pass but achieved only a 57% approval vote. Most recently, in a new referendum on the Citizens' Assembly proposal, only 38% of the voters agreed with the result the deliberative body preferred. Some analysis of the new vote in BC can be found here and here.
In 2005, I emphasized that these two-tiered reform systems (deliberative bodies then mass democracy) are quite counterproductive because they invite back in at the second stage all the pathologies of mass democracy that you are precisely seeking to avoid by handing over decision-making power to the deliberative body. Of course, the advantage of the two-tiered system is making sure lay citizens who have no direct political accountability and may not be representative are constrained in some way. But Canada's experience tells us that this probably ain't the way to do it (and California's new Prop 11 Citizens' Redistricting Commission, for all its faults, isn't following Canada's lead here). It seems that citizens will take their cues from partisans with their own interests rather than from their fellow citizens who spent the time trying to perfect their election system.
Still, a two-tiered method might work if the citizens are at the back-end making the actual policy and the agenda-setters themselves have political accountability and representation going for them. Stay tuned for more on that, since Chris and I are working on such a design.
Full post as published by Prawfs on July 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
$69M Settlement Approved in Volkswagen, Audi Design Defect Class Action
$69M Settlement Approved in Volkswagen, Audi Design Defect Class Action
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Refco
Ex-CEO Gets 16 Years
Nail Guns
Injury Rate More Than Doubles in Three Years
False Arrest
City of Greer pays $50,000 settlement after imprisoning a woman whose charges had been dismissed years earlier.

Elmendorf: A Reply to Bob Bauer
Elmendorf: Two Models for Building Public Confidence in the Electoral Process
Fairness and transparency in electoral law reform (Scoop.co.nz)
To keep or not to keep the Electoral College
"Judicial Review of Electoral Mechanics After Crawford"








