ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

IRS Offers Advice on Disability Exception to Pre- 59 1/2 Distribution Penalty from IRA

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

In May 2009 the IRS has issued Chief Counsel advice 200922041 which offers guidance on the meaning of "disabled" as it relates to IRC 72(m)(7), the disability exception to the 10%, pre 59 1/2 distribution penalties from IRAs and annuities (the use of  "annuities" in this case does not include structured settlement annuities). This information may be useful to financial planners, settlement planners, lawyers and settlement consultants who are reviewing resources to pay for care and living expenses and developing strategies for a plaintiff's recovery. Provided a person qualifies and has offsetting deductions, it may be more advantageous to break an IRA under the exception and take in taxable income, to take advantage of tax exempt build up and payout in a structured settlement.

Per CCA 200922041, in order to be considered disabled as defined in Code section 72(m)(7),

  1. The individual has to establish that he was not able to work in the year of the distribution at an activity comparable to the one in which he would customarily engage. 
  2. The individual must also meet the criteria of the Regulations such that with reasonable effort and safety to himself, the impairment cannot be diminished to the extent that the individual will not be prevented by the impairment from engaging in his customary or any other comparable substantial gainful activity

The criteria also require that the disability be one that "can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration." The exception is not designed to preclude the 10% penalty in the case of a temporarily disability.

Relevant Case Law

  1. In Re Black, 204 BR 701 (1996)
  2. Dwyer v Commissioner, 106 T.C. 337 (1996)

Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on July 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/02/26 21:12:17)