Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Grits for Breakfast
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Grits for Breakfast'Scent lineups stink to critics'
ADVERTISEMENTS
The title of this post is the headline over a USA Today article published today voicing criticisms of Fort Bend County Sheriff's Deputy Keith Pikett's use of bloodhounds to conduct "scent lineups," which have led to false accusations in two recent cases including one that resulted in a DNA exoneration. According to USA Today:Two federal lawsuits are casting a harsh spotlight on an investigative tool long beloved by American law enforcement: a bloodhound's nose. Lawsuits filed in Victoria, Texas, allege that Fort Bend County Sheriff's Deputy Keith Pikett and his team of hounds ? James Bond, Quincy and Clue ? failed controversial sniff tests known as "scent lineups." Much like in traditional lineups, the dogs link human scents left at crime scenes to samples from suspects...continue to full postFull post as published by Grits for Breakfast on June 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

'Scent Lineups' Stink to Critics
Do "scent lineups" help police find the right suspect
Op-Ed: Public defender sevices stink
The Austin American-Statesman on Eyewitness ID
When photo lineups are wrong...








