Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeJury verdict in Centocor v. Abbott
By Michael C. Smith
A Marshall jury in Judge Ward's court rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff Centocor today. The jury sent out five notes before finding that the defendant infringed all four of the asserted claims. The jury found that Abbott had failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that the claims were invalid for failure to meet the enablement requirement, the written description requirement, or as anticipated, and that the plaintiff had shown by clear and convincing evidence that the infringement was willful.
Damages were set at $1.168 billion dollars in lost profits, and $504.128 million in royalties.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on June 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Abbott Nutrition
Calcilo XD Infant Formula Recalled
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict Against Fisher Controls International
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict
Abbott
Issues Recall of POWERSAIL Coronary Dilatation Catheters
$1.5 Million Verdict for Injured Worker
$1.5 Million Verdict for Injured Worker
$11,000,000 Verdict Awarded in Nursing Home Wrongful Death Suit
$11,000,000 Verdict Awarded in Nursing Home Wrongful Death Suit
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case

Centocor v. Abbott: $1.67 Billion Jury Verdict
Johnson & Johnson wins $1.67 Billion from Texas Jury
Abbott loses big time to J&J over Humira
UIowa takes a whack at Abbott/Humira
Publication: SUbscribe to Jury Verdict Analysis Service here
New Filing in Abbott v. Abbott
Innogenetics and Abbott Settle Dispute over HCV Technology







