Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search"
Yesterday in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes had an article headlined "Student Strip Search Illegal; School Violated Teen Girl's Rights, Supreme Court Rules." The newspaper also contained an editorial entitled "Strip Searches and the Law: A smart compromise balances the rights of students with the needs of school administrators."
Yesterday in The Los Angeles Times, David G. Savage had an article headlined "Supreme Court declares strip-search of student unconstitutional; The 8-1 decision says Arizona school officials lacked justification for such an invasive search of a 13-year-old girl, who was suspected of hiding ibuprofen pills." And today's newspaper contains an editorial entitled "A common-sense ruling on strip searches: A Supreme Court decision lays down a bright line for school officials."
In yesterday's edition of USA Today, Joan Biskupic reported that "Strip search at school violated girl's rights, high court rules; Souter says there must be 'reasonable suspicion of danger.'" The newspaper also contained an editorial entitled "Strip-search case ends in victory for common sense: Justices' ruling exposes folly of ham-handed 'zero-tolerance' policies," while Francisco M. Negron had an op-ed entitled "Ruling missed opportunity: Justices didn't clarify boundaries for schools on 'personal searches.'"
Yesterday in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reported that "Court Faults Strip-Search of Student."
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor had an article headlined "Supreme Court: Strip-search of 13-year-old girl was illegal; The decision sets the standard for how far school officials can go in conducting searches of students' property."
law.com's Tony Mauro reported that "Supreme Court rules student strip search unconstitutional."
And yesterday in The Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer had an article headlined "US high court: Strip search unjustified."
Full post as published by How Appealing on June 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Two Kentucky Counties
settle strip search class action lawsuits
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Illegal Strip Search
Lawsuit Reaches $2.1 Million Settlement
County Jail Strip Search Class Action
Preliminary Settlement Reached

Supreme Court Finds Strip Search Unconstitutional
AZ- U.S. Supreme Court will hear strip-search appeal
Justices Rule Strip Search Suit Can Proceed
AZ- VICTORY! Supreme Court Finds Strip-Search of 13-Year Old Girl Unconstitutional
VICTORY! Supreme Court Finds Strip-Search of 13-Year Old Girl Unconstitutional
U.S. Supreme Court Declares Strip Search Of 13-Year-Old Student Unconstitutional









