Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: DiscriminationsSupremes Preserve But Gut, Or At Least Limit, Section 5
Attentive readers will (I hope) have noticed that I?ve not posted much lately. My wife and I have been in California visiting our daughter (who, by the way, has just had an important article accepted by a major journal; more on that some time later), and I?ve fallen behind.
I?ll try to catch up when I can (meanwhile, enjoy your breather), but now that I have an online minute I?d like to point you to the excellent discussions of the Supreme Court?s recent decision on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act by Hans Bader, Roger Clegg and Todd Gaziano. I?m sure more will come later; watch for UPDATEs.
Full post as published by Discriminations on June 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Gitmo detainees have a right to be heard in federal court, Supremes say
Post Trial Motion Not Necessary To Preserve Issue Of Expert Testimony For Appeal In Jury Case
International Law, and Order: The Supremes limit foreign intrusion on U.S. courts.
Supremes Hold (7-2) That Section 1981 Encompasses Retaliation Claims
Gun Control, the Pink Pistols, and the Supremes








