ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

From the files of Politico?

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

Rep. Dan Burton: trying to keep Congress safe?

Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) seems afraid of being on the House floor.

Burton offered an amendment to H.R. 2918 that said the following: “Would require the Comptroller General to submit a report to the Committee on House Administration within 6 months of enactment analyzing the security arrangements of the House Chamber, including whether enclosing the House galleries in a transparent shield would be an appropriate and cost-effective measure.”

Basically, Burton wanted a study to be done that would determine whether closing the House galleries would be “a cost effective security measure,” explained his spokesman John Donnelly. Or, in laymen’s terms as told to us by someone familiar with the situation, “he wants a plexiglass wall to stop the public” from doing anything dangerous from the House gallery.

He has nothing against visitors or the Capitol Police who do a great job Donnelly tells Shenanigans, but the fact remains that “the Capitol Building is one of the top 2 targets for terrorists in the world,” Donnelly explains.

And at first if you don?t succeed, try again. This isn’t Burton’s first go at talking about closing the House galleries - or to have a study to see if closing the House galleries worthwhile - back in the 1980’s Burton asked the same thing.

?It’s a perennial of Burton’s,? another source says. ?It has been routinely rejected because both parties have viewed it as separating the people from their House, and sends the wrong message. Rules has never highlighted.? And, sadly that’s what happened Thursday after the vote-o-rama, the Rules Committee didn’t approve it to be considered.

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on June 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)