ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

?Much Is Owed?; Slavery Apology Vote Rekindling Talk of Reparations

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

ogletreeCan an apology from the federal government atone for 2 1/2 centuries of slavery? Perhaps not, but that fact isn’t keeping Congress from trying.

The Senate unanimously passed a resolution on Thursday apologizing for slavery, making way for a joint congressional resolution. Click here for the WaPo story.

“You wonder why we didn’t do it 100 years ago,” Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), lead sponsor of the resolution, said after the vote. “It is important to have a collective response to a collective injustice.”

The apology follows a similar apology passed last year by the House. One key difference is that the Senate version explicitly says that the resolution cannot be used in support of claims for restitution. The House is expected to revisit the issue next week to conform its resolution to the Senate version.

(The WaPo story doesn’t mention this, but we wonder if, on the issue of reparations, the Senate had in the back of its mind a recent Supreme Court case involving Hawaii. At issue: whether a Congressional apology for an 1893 American-instigated coup in Hawaii conferred property rights on modern-day descendents of native Hawaiians. The Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision made in March, held that it didn’t.)

In any event, Rep. Stephen I. Cohen (D-Tenn.), who began pushing for an apology more than a decade ago said the vote was certain not to please everyone. He said: “there are going to be African Americans who think that [the apology] is not reparations, and it’s not action, and there are going to be Caucasians who say, ‘Get over it.’ . . . I look at it as something that makes people think.”

Still, there are those out there who want reparations. Charles Ogletree, for instance, the Harvard law professor who has championed restitution, said the resolution was not a substitute for reparations. “That battle will be prolonged,” he said.

Randall Robinson, author of “The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks,” said he sees the Senate’s apology as a “confession” that should lead to a next step of reparations. “Much is owed, and it is very quantifiable,” he said. “It is owed as one would owe for any labor that one has not paid for, and until steps are taken in that direction we haven’t accomplished anything.”


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on June 19, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0189 secs (new cache)