Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits LawEighth Circuit Enforces ?But For? Burden of Proof in ADEA Case
By Donald W. Heyrich
In an Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) action claiming a wrongful demotion, the lower court had instructed the jury to enter a verdict for the plaintiff if he proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was demoted and his age was a motivating factor in the demotion decision.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the jury verdict holding that a plaintiff bringing an ADEA disparate-treatment claim must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that age was the "but-for" cause of the challenged adverse employment action. Read more...
Full post as published by Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits Law on June 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

Eighth Circuit formally rejects heightened burden of proof in modern federal sentencing
SCOTUS - Age discrimination: Burden of proof never shifts
The remaining circuit split over due process burden-of-proof requirements
Two notable sentencing rulings from the Eighth Circuit
ADEA Meacham RFOA Oral Argument Transcript Analysis








