ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

Lakehead U May Use Google Email System

By Simon Fodden

ADVERTISEMENTS

Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario, switched from an internal email system to Google Mail. The Faculty Association objected on the grounds that this breached terms in the collective agreement giving faculty the right to privacy in their personal and professional communications. The argument was that because Google and the relevant servers are based in the United States, authorities from that country would have legitimate and other access to faculty members’ communications.

The grievance went to arbitration and the arbitrator ruled [PDF] that Lakehead’s use of Google Mail did not breach the terms of the collective agreement. The faculty association was unable to demonstrate that Lakehead’s email was in fact stored on servers outside Canada, the best evidence being that it was currently stored within the country. Testimony was given (including some by Michael Geist) that in any case the U.S. authorities had various ways of reading faculty mail whether or not it was stored on servers in the United States. Principally, however, the association failed because the arbitrator found that the agreement did not require the university to provide an email system exempt from outside penetration.

The arbitrator concluded:

The Collective Agreement, I have found, does not provide that level of protection. While I am sympathetic to their plight and the fact that big brother could be watching over their e-mail communications, it simply brings to the fore the caution advanced by [University Vice-President] Mr. Pawlowski when he commented upon e-mail systems generally before the [University] Senate. One should consider e-mail communications as confidential as are postcards.

I trust that after numerous warnings of this sort over the years, no lawyer regards email as a mode of communication that is at all secure or confidential. And that where confidential material is sent by email, lawyers use encryption.

[via E-Tips]

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)