Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingFourth Circuit denies rehearing en banc of decision affirming conviction for sending obscene textual email
In news coverage of yesterday's order, The Associated Press reports that "Appeals court won't hear Richmond obscenity case."
My earlier coverage of the divided three-judge panel's ruling appears at this link.
Full post as published by How Appealing on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Computer Spyware Act
Spammer to pay $100,000 settlement in email fraud lawsuit.
Microsoft Spam
Richter pays $7 million settlement in deceptive email lawsuit.

Obscenity Conviction for Adult-to-Adult Noncommercial E-mail About (Fantasy) Sex With Children:
In Re Comiskey: Fed. Cir. Narrowly Denies Rehearing En Banc
9th Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in ERISA Preemption Case
Notable Ninth Circuit dissents about reasonableness review from deneial of rehearing en banc
CA1: En banc rehearing denied in Cerqueira so the First really does like racial profiling
Ninth Circuit again affirms Ukraine ex-PM corruption conviction







