Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Credit Slips
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bankruptcy
: Credit SlipsA further thought on securitization regulation
By Stephen Lubben
ADVERTISEMENTS
As I noted in my earlier treatise post, the Administration has proposed requiring all originators to keep a stake in each asset securitization, to ensure that they have "skin in the game." In particular, the Administration proposes requiring retention of a 5% stake, and would further mandate that the stake remain unhedged.
The last bit troubles Felix Salmon, who seems to think that makes CFOs life difficult. Perhaps, but should we care? In particular, there clearly is some tension between this proposal and traditional risk management. But at present, originators can use CDS to give themselves a zero or even negative stake in the outcome of the securitization. In such a world -- and that's the world we'll return to if we simply restart the securitization market without change -- the downward spiral of asset quality I described in my prior post in essentially unstoppable.
Sure investors will be "smart" now, and they won't buy low quality assets with the same mania, but individual investor moderation does only little to address the systemic issues that come from excessive securitization. Only an unhedged originator stake can correctly align incentives. I doubt 5% is a sufficiently large stake; but it's a start, indeed any number greater than zero is a move in the right direction.
Full post as published by Credit Slips on June 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Securitization (or, why you cant work out a lower mortgage payment)
Insurer Regularity Insured by State Regulators.
Securitization and the "New" Insurance, No Assurance.
Securitization: Advanta and the Fiction of True-Sale
Plank on Securitization of Receivables








