ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Copyright Law

: Recording Industry vs The People

RIAA's motion to bar Jammie Thomas-Rasset from objecting to copyright registrations denied in Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset

By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset, the RIAA's motion to preclude defendant from objecting to copyright registrations was denied.

Judge Michael J. Davis held as follows:

The Court?s Order granting a new trial in this matter granted an entirely new trial on all issues. The fact that Defendant did not object to Plaintiffs? evidence of registration in the First Trial does not preclude Defendant from putting Plaintiffs to their burden of proof on this issue in the retrial.
Judge Davis rejected the RIAA's argument that the Court could take "judicial notice" of the registrations:
Defendant vigorously challenges the authenticity of the registrations and Plaintiffs? ownership and registration of the copyrights at issue, so judicial notice is inappropriate. See Fed. R. Evid. 201(b) (?A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.?); Int?l Star Class Yacht Racing Ass?n v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 146 F.3d 66, 70 (2d Cir. 1998) (?Because the effect of judicial notice is to deprive a party of the opportunity to use rebuttal evidence, cross?examination, and argument to attack contrary evidence, caution must be used in determining that a fact is beyond controversy under Rule 201(b).?) (citations omitted).

June 8, 2009, Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Preclude Defendant from Making Objections

Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on June 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0122 secs (new cache)