Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogEisenberg, Heise, Waters, and Wells on Empirical Study of Punitive Damages
By Lawrence Solum
Theodore Eisenberg, Michael Heise, Nicole L. Waters and Martin T. Wells (Cornell University - School of Law, Cornell Law School, National Center for State Courts and Cornell University - School of Law) have posted The Decision to Award Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Empirical studies have consistently shown that punitive damages are rarely awarded, with rates of about three to five percent of plaintiff trial wins. Using the 2005 data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics Civil Justice Survey, this article shows that knowing in which cases plaintiffs sought punitive damages transforms the picture of punitive damages. Not accounting for whether punitive damages were sought obscures the meaningful punitive damages rate, the rate of awards in cases in which they were sought, by a factor of nearly 10, and obfuscates a more explicable pattern of awards than has been reported. Punitive damages were surprisingly infrequently sought, with requests found in about 10% of tried cases that plaintiffs won. Punitive damages were awarded in about 30% these trials. Awards were most frequent in cases of intentional tort, with a punitive award rate of over 60%. Greater harm corresponded to a greater probability of an award: the size of the compensatory award was significantly associated with whether punitive damages were awarded, with a rate of approximately 60% for cases with compensatory awards of $1 million or more. Regression models correctly classify about 70% or more of the punitive award request outcomes, Judge-jury differences in the rate of awards exist, with judges awarding punitive damages at a higher rate in personal injury cases and juries awarding them at a higher rate in nonpersonal injury cases. These puzzling adjudicator differences may be a consequence of the routing of different cases to judges and juries.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on June 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Waters Corp
WAT
Waters Corp
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Wells Fargo Faces Loan Discrimination Class Action
Wells Fargo Faces Loan Discrimination Class Action
Wells Fargo Faces Potential Class Action Over Home Equity Credit Lines
Wells Fargo Faces Potential Class Action over Home Equity Credit Lines
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Procrit
Associated with Death in Stroke Study

The Decision to Award Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study
Eisenberg, et al. on The Decision to Award Punitive Damages
An Empirical Assessment of Punitive Damages
Two Torts-Related Recommendations from Solum
Choi & Eisenberg on Punitive Damages in Securities Arbitration
Eisenberg, Heise, and Wells Post Punitive Damages Article on SSRN
Conference on punitive damages at Vienna








