ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Bebchuk & Spamann on Regulating Banker's Pay

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS

Lucian A. Bebchuk and Holger Spamann (Harvard University - Harvard Law School and Harvard University - Harvard Law School) have posted Regulating Bankers? Pay on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

    This paper contributes to understanding the role of executive compensation as a possible cause of the current financial crisis, to assessing current legislative and regulatory attempts to discourage bank executives from taking excessive risks, and to identifying how bankers? pay should be reformed and regulated going forward.

    Although there is now wide recognition that bank executives? decisions might have been distorted by the short-term focus of pay packages, we identify a separate and critical distortion that has received little attention. Because bank executives have been paid with shares in bank holding companies or options on such shares, and both banks and bank holding companies issued much debt to bondholders, executives? payoffs have been tied to highly levered bets on the value of banks? capital. These highly levered structures gave executives powerful incentives to under-weight downside risks.

    We show that current legislative and regulatory attempts to discourage bank executives from taking excessive risks fail to address this identified factor. In particular, recently adopted requirements aimed at aligning the interests of executives tightly with those of the common shareholders of bank holding companies ? through emphasizing awards of restricted shares in these companies and introducing ?say on pay? votes by these shareholders ? miss the mark. The common shareholders of bank holding companies, especially now that the value of their investment has decreased considerably, would favor much more risk-taking than would be in the interest of the government as preferred shareholder and guarantor of some of the bank?s obligations.

    Finally, having identified the problems with current legislative and regulatory attempts, we analyze how best to implement recent legislative mandates that require banks receiving financial support from the government to avoid providing executives with incentives to take excessive risks. Beyond banks receiving governmental support, we put forward a novel strategy for banking regulation; we argue that monitoring and regulating bankers? pay should be an important element of banking regulation in general; and we analyze how banking regulators should assess and regulate bankers? pay.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on June 04, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)