Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> California Labor & Employment Defense Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: California Labor & Employment Defense BlogEmployment Ruling At Center Stage For Sotomayor Confirmation
As judge for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007, Judge Sotomayor affirmed a lower court's ruling that 17 white and two Hispanic firefighters were not discriminated against in violation of Title VII and the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. The case is Ricci vs. DeStefano. This ruling is being closely examined in Judge Sotomayor's confirmation to the US Supreme Court and is drawing many criticisms.
The firefighters argued that the city of New Haven discriminated against them on the basis of their race when it threw out the results of a test that qualified the 19 firefighters for a promotion. The city threw out the results on the basis that none of the 27 black firefighters who took the exam, and passed, scored high enough to qualify for the promotion.
The lower court judge, Janet Bond Arterton, ruled that the city did not discriminate against the white and Hispanic firefighters. She said the city's attempt to avoid discriminating against minority firefighters was "race neutral," because "all the test results were discarded, no one was promoted, and firefighters of every race will have to participate in another selection process." The firefighters' appeal of the decision brought the case in front of Judge Sotomayor and two other judges for the Second Court of Appeals.
Judge Sotomayor and the other two judges upheld the lower court's ruling in a two-paragraph opinion citing the reasons set forth in the lower court's 'thorough, thoughtful, and well-reasoned opinion.' The Los Angeles Times reports that other judges in the Second Circuit thought the opinion was inadequate, but a move to have it reconsidered was stopped by a vote of 7-6 by the judges.
The United States Supreme Court accepted review of the case. Oral arguments took place in April 2009, and a ruling from the Supreme Court is expected this month.
Full post as published by California Labor & Employment Defense Blog on June 02, 2009 (boomark / email).
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
University of Illinois Medical Center
Potential $14 Million in Malpractice Settlements
Siouxland Urology Center
Sued for Potentially Exposing Clients to HIV and Hepatitis
Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada
alleging gross negligence in reusing syringes linked to a hepatitis C outbreak.
Furloughed Workers
File Employment Lawsuits

HMM: Sotomayor Enters Confirmation Process with Miers-Like Numbers. Sonia Sotomayor will begin he
Live Blog of Judge Sotomayor’s Confirmation Hearings–Day 2
"Confirmation Hearings Begin for Judge Sonia Sotomayor"
Timing Sotomayor’s Senate Confirmation
Sotomayor Gets Support of Locals at Confirmation Hearings
Senate Prepares for the Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings
On The Hill, Sotomayor Tests Out a Catch Phrase
Sotomayor Confirmation Hearing Set to Begin July 13








