Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectConservatives vs. Libertarians on the Sotomayor nomination
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
Richard A. Epstein writing at Forbes: "Her opponents have to engage in a more fine-grained inquiry that shows why the judges, like Sotomayor, who work in the progressive tradition embrace a judicial philosophy that leads them to make both kinds of constitutional errors. Intervening in cases where they should stay out--Roe v. Wade comes to mind--and not intervening where they ought to intervene, as in Kelo and Didden."Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 02, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

RICHARD EPSTEIN: Libertarians vs. Conservatives: Two Different Approaches to the Sotomayor Nominat
Is "Fine-Grained" Always Better
Gregory Craig Debriefs on Sotomayor Nomination
The Politics of the Sotomayor Nomination
MORE ON SOTOMAYOR: Damon Root writes on Why libertariansand everyone who believes in limited gov
Sotomayor Nomination - Initial Reaction Round-up, Part I
IRAN: Are conservatives more libertarian than the libertarians Depends on the libertarians in que
Public Policy and the Role of Principles:








