Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Rob Hyndman .com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Rob Hyndman .comA Breathtaking Act of Intellectual Dishonesty by the Conference Board of Canada
By Rob Hyndman
Michael Geist has the details here. I have to admit to being simply flabbergasted when I read his post. I’m always admired the Conference Board for its reputation for impartiality and quality. Frankly, I now feel quite the fool.
There is no black and white here. Whether the Board’s slavish adherence to the bullying line taken by US legacy film and music interests is deliberate or arises out of ignorance is largely irrelevant. These are profoundly important public policy issues, and as citizens we rely on people in positions of impartial authority, whether because they are in government or because they present as impartial experts, to participate in policy development with courage, honesty and competence. I think we are owed an explanation. Here is a draft of an email I sent out today. I urge you to do the same - you can get the links on Michael’s post.
………………………..
Ms. Golden, Mr. Toope, Ms. Samarasekera and Mr. Wilkerson,
Please add my name to what is I hope a fast-growing list of Canadians who have informed you that they are profoundly disappointed that the Conference Board, with the aid of the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, has chosen to align itself, presumably for political expediency, with legacy film and music interests in the United States, instead of performing the increasingly easy exercise, for the benefit of sensible policy development in Canada, of debunking their wild-eyed and fantastical claims of injury from Canadian intellectual property laws. Your report defies common sense, good policy and honest, impartial intellectual inquiry.
Dr. Michael Geist ably summarizes these issues: [link]
And frankly, shame on the Conference Board for holding such a one-sided public relations opportunity for US film and music interests: [link]
There are many very smart people doing hard work and making considerable personal sacrifices to ensure that Canadians can evaluate these issues in a balanced and sensible manner, far away from the moneyed influences trying so hard to skew our laws in favour of their financial interests.
The Conference Board, with the aid of the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, has done enormous damage to his process, engaging in acts of seemingly breathtaking intellectual indifference and dishonesty, and frankly, you have much work ahead of you earning back the trust you have so cavalierly frittered away by these actions. I hope you begin this process by responding immediately to the questions Dr. Geist has directed to you.
Yours truly,
Rob Hyndman
Similar Posts:- None Found
Full post as published by Rob Hyndman .com on May 25, 2009 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Compellent, Storage Engine, et. al.
$10.5 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
General Electric Co. and SABIC Innovative Plastics
$3 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
Fayette County School Board
faces sex abuse class action lawsuit
Undetected Sewage Spill
Prichard Water Works and Sewer Board spends $17 million on upgrades and testing.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Utilities Whistleblower
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities agrees to $485,000 fine for setting up a private bank account.

Open Ed Conference 2009 - Call for Proposals
Deliberate Dishonesty Draws Actual Suspension
Copyright Conferences and Balance
17th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference
Intellectual Property Injunctions in Canada
Copyright Board of Canada Looking for Board Members









