Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Neuroethics and Law
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Neuroethics and LawNeuroethics 1:1 Roskies
By Neil Levy
ADVERTISEMENTS
Adina Roskies holds PhDs in both neuroscience and philosophy, and has published important programmatic statements setting out the agenda for neuroethics. In her paper, she turns to the question of how reliable neuroimaging is as a guide to mental functions and processes. Some people accuse neuroimaging of being phrenology updated, whereas others are over-credulous of its powers. Roskies suggests steering a middle path, recognizing the limitations and the powers of neuroimaging. PDF HTML
Full post as published by Neuroethics and Law on February 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.










