ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Illinois Judges to Attorneys: Let?s Spiff it Up a Bit, Shall We?

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

allymcbealSome esteemed federal judges in Illinois, it seems, have a bone to pick with some of the lawyers who appear before them. It concerns not the lawyers’ cross-examination or Bluebooking skills, but their attire. Click here for the NLJ story; here for the ABA Journal’s take.

Apparently, the judges launched in on their sartorial sniping earlier this week at a panel discussion at the Seventh Circuit Bar Association meeting. The discussion was reportedly touched off by Northern District of Illinois judge Joan Lefkow, who reportedly said some women attorneys should pay more attention to dressing appropriately for court. Specifically, Lefkow reported having an issue with one woman who had shown up for a court hearing in attire that looked as though she had stopped in “on her way home from the gym.” Lefkow then suggested that lawyers address the “delicate issue” with female colleagues at their firms, and suggested that women lawyers consult www.corporette.com, a fashion Web site one of her clerks had shown her.

A fellow panel member, Central District of Illinois chief judge Michael McClusky picked up the theme, apparently dismayed that some women come into court wearing “skirts so short that there’s no way they can sit down and blouses so short there’s no way the judges wouldn’t look.”

Northern District of Illinois bankruptcy judge Benjamin Goldgar chimed in, saying he too considers the issue “a huge problem.” Sometimes it’s so difficult that Goldgar said he wishes he could tell the female lawyer standing before him: “I’d really like to pay attention to your argument.” Goldgar said that male attorneys who come before him with wacky ties, like those with lots of smiley faces, also cross the line of appropriateness.

And wherein lies the cause of this? Some of the attendees blamed law firms for not giving lawyers enough guidance. Others said law schools needed to do a better job of educating young lawyers on appropriate dress.

LB Readers, we’d like to hear from you on this one. On the one hand, we can understand the need to maintain decorum and dignity in the courtroom. On the other, we’re not sure how we feel about the thought of a judge losing concentration over an attorney’s attire. And smiley-faced ties? Are these really such an affront?


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on May 21, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)