Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumGuest Blogger Alex Long's Ten Things You May or May Not Know About Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
Professor Alex Long has passed along this wonderful post in anticipation of the Supreme Court's decision in the Caperton case:
Thanks to Andrew Perlman, who invited me to blog a little about the Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. case now pending in front of the Supreme Court. I imagine most readers are more or less familiar with the gist of Caperton. There has been a good bit of mainstream media coverage of this case since the facts really do read like something out of a John Grisham novel. In a nutshell, the CEO (Don Blankenship) of a coal company (Massey) spent about $3 million to help unseat Justice Warren McGraw of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. The newly elected justice, Brent Benjamin, refused to disqualify himself in Massey?s appeal of a $50 million fraud verdict and ultimately voted in Massey?s favor in a 3-2 decision. The Supreme Court heard arguments in March as to whether there was a violation of the other side?s Due Process rights resulting from Benjamin?s failure to recuse, so a decision may be out soon.
To help
pass the time before the Court delivers its opinion, I thought I?d do a series
of posts on the case. I?ll start here
with Part 1 of my attempt to pass along a little in the way of background on
the case and on judicial selection in West
Virginia
(2) It?s not easy being a Republican judge in West Virginia
(3) Things were ugly on the
(4) The general
election contest involving Benjamin and McGraw was ugly. You probably already knew that. But the details are still pretty bizarre. The most infamous tv ad accused McGraw
of letting ?a child rapist go free to work in schools? when McGraw joined a 3-2
majority to grant probation for a convicted sex offender. (See here and here.) The race was so ugly that McGraw later
filed (what I think was) a tort claim of false light based on the ads. But McGraw gave
Benjamin plenty to work with too (as this video, known as the ?Rant from Racine
(5) Massey?s CEO did
it all ?for the sake of the kids.?
Many of the 2004 anti-McGraw ads were paid for by a 527 group called ??
and for the sake of the Kids,? a group established by Massey CEO Don
Blankenship. The group?s now-dormant
website explains that ?the politicians have been putting themselves first for
too long, [so] West Virginia
See the rest of the list here.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on May 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Pesticides
Long-Term Exposure Linked to Diabetes
Long-Term Insurance Suit
Settled for $15 Million
UnumProvident
for allegedly denying long-term disability claims.
Bell Canada
alleging wrongful charging for long distance phone calls

Popular election of state judges in America: are we done yet
Respondents Brief Filed for Caperton v. Massey
"Simplistic media coverage of Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal"
High Court Won't Consider Second W.Va. Judicial Bias Case








