Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Underdog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: UnderdogMaryland bars HGN evidence without expert testimony.
By Marks & Katz, LLC
ADVERTISEMENTS
Image from National Institute of Standards & Technology. If you are going to drive after drinking alcohol, why agree to perform the junk science "tests" requested by a cop suspecting you of drunk driving? Ironically, today Maryland's highest court mandated expert testimony to present evidence on the junk science horizontal gaze nystagmus. Does not junk science preclude the possibility of expert testimony? Maryland v. Blackwell, __ Md. _ (May 14, 2009). Yes, if it were not for the slew of courts who do not view it as junk. Enter Maryland's Court of Appeals, which ruled that HGN testimony is expert testimony, and requires that the witness first be qualified as an expert. Blackwell. Consequently, under the Maryland evidentiary rules, if the prosecutor fails to provide a timely and sufficiently detailed HGN expert witness designation, the testimony should be precluded...continue to full postFull post as published by Underdog on May 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Live from the Maryland Commission...
Expert Economic Testimony, Economic Evidence and Asymmetry of Information in Antitrust Cases
Yet Another Opinion on the Law of Expert Testimony
Required Qualifications for Expert Witnesses in Michigan Business Litigation Cases
Former CEO's Insider Trading Convictions Reversed; Expert Improperly Excluded
No Abuse of Discretion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Testimony on False Confessions








