Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Missouri Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Missouri Injury Lawyer BlogState Supreme Court Grants New Trial in Missouri Auto Products Liability Lawsuit
By Jeff Lowe, Esq.
Victims of a fatal a rear-end crash can have a new trial in their Missouri product liability lawsuit, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled May 5. According to the Associated Press, the court said misbehavior by attorneys for Ford tainted the trial, entitling motorist Michael Nolte and the family of Trooper Michael Newton to a new trial. The decision is also seen as a victory for law enforcement officers and families who have long contended that Ford Crown Victorias -- vehicles commonly used as police cars -- are unreasonably likely to explode into flames when rear-ended.
Unfortunately, that?s exactly what happened to Nolte and Newton in 2003. Newton, the state trooper, had pulled Nolte over for a traffic violation and put him in the trooper?s car on the shoulder of Interstate 70. When they were rear-ended by a pickup truck, the cruiser burst into flames, killing Newton and injuring Nolte before he could be pulled from the fire. Newton?s family and Nolte sued Ford, alleging that Ford?s vehicle design was defective because it placed the fuel tank behind the back axle, making an explosion likely in a rear-end accident. They also sued the truck?s driver and his or her employer, a claim that has been resolved and is not at issue in the appeal.
At trial, Missouri product liability attorneys for the plaintiff wanted to introduce evidence of ten similar accidents involving rear-ended Crown Victorias -- four before Newton?s accident and six after. They were particularly interested in showing evidence that Crown Victorias retrofitted with shields on their gas tanks, as Newton?s was, still carried an unreasonably high risk of explosion. The judge ruled that they could only introduce the four earlier accidents, but a lawyer for Ford introduced evidence about the six others anyway. Because the plaintiffs were under the judge?s orders not to discuss that evidence or argue their side of the story, this put them at a disadvantage, the Missouri Supreme Court found. Thus, it said, they are entitled to a new trial.
Members of the law enforcement community have been concerned about problems with Crown Victoria gas tanks for more than 20 years. (The related Mercury Grand Marquis and Lincoln Town Car may share this flaw, though they are less likely to be used as police cars.) The concern is the placement of the vehicle?s gas tank behind the rear axle, which critics say make it highly likely to be punctured in a rear-end collision, causing an instant explosion. Within moments, officers and others inside the car can be surrounded by flames. By one estimate, at least 21 law enforcement officers and uncounted civilians have died in this way. In 2002, Ford retrofitted hundreds of thousands of police Crown Victorias with gas tank shields, but critics dispute whether this has helped.
Flaws such as this with the design or manufacture of a vehicle are a form of product defects, just like problems with toys or hairbrushes. When they cause or exacerbate a serious car wreck, victims in Missouri have the right to file a St. Louis auto product liability lawsuit holding the vehicle?s manufacturer legally responsible. In these lawsuits, victims can claim compensation for the loss of a loved one, a permanent disability or a serious injury, as well as compensation for medical bills and other costs of the crash.
If you and your family are in this situation, The Lowe Law Firm would like to help. Based in St. Louis and Belleville, Ill., we represent people who were injured by flawed consumer products throughout Missouri and southern Illinois. If you would like to learn more, we offer free, confidential consultations -- so there?s no risk to you in telling us about your case and learning about your legal options. To set one up, you can contact us through our Web site or call 1-877-678-3400.
Full post as published by Missouri Injury Lawyer Blog on May 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
St. Louis Car Accident - St. Louis Auto Accident, St. Louis Car Accident Lawyer
St. Louis Car Accident alleging liability for personal injuries caused by car accidents in St. Louis, Missouri.
Missouri Accidents
alleging liability for personal injuries caused by car, truck, bus, motorcycle or other Missouri vehicle accidents.
Missouri Motorcycle Accident
alleging liability for personal injuries caused by a motorcycle accidents in Missouri.
Missouri Truck Accident
alleging liability for personal injuries caused by a truck accident in Missouri.
Springfield Accident
alleging liability for personal injuries caused by car, truck, bus, motorcycle or other Springfield, Missouri vehicle accidents.

Products Liability at Heart of 3rd Circuit Prediction
Pa. Supreme Court May Import Negligence Concepts Into Products Liability Law
Supreme Scrooge: Arizona's Supreme Court Delivers a Serious Blow to Products Liability
Mitsubishi Faces Product Liability Lawsuit in Florida, SUVs Recalled For Defective Seatbelts
Lawyer Tips: New Products Liability Suits Picking Up the Pieces
Missouri Injury Settlement - $100,000 for Injury to Child's Eye from Rigid Plastic Toy Knife









