Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyWho would of thunk it?
By cdw
ADVERTISEMENTS
Who would have thunk that on the day lightning strikes in the Fourth Circuit in Justin Wolfe’s case that the Ninth Circuit, en banc, would deny rehearing or relief on a plausible claim of factual innocence, that of Kevin Cooper . From Prof Martin:
It’s 113 pages. Single-spaced. Plus, that figure doesn’t even contain the majority opinion, since we’re talking about a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc.
Still. If you’re going to read one 100+ page dissent from the Ninth Circuit this year, this should be the one.
I say that notwithstanding the fact — and I know this will turn some people off — that Judge Willie Fletcher’s dissent contains a number of graphs and a number of references to r-squared statistics and the like...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on May 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

China Media: The Truth Is Out There Somewhere
Common Ground With The Plaintiffs' Bar!
Aussie Court Pontiff-icates, Allows Protesters at World Youth Day
Aetna and Microsoft's HealthVault









