ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Open and Shut

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Open and Shut

Who knows what parliamentarians do with our money?

ADVERTISEMENTS
The three jurisdictions in Australia moving now on Freedom of Information reforms have shown no interest in extending the scope of legislation to parliament.The Federal and NSW governments haven't bothered to explain publicly why they rejected recommendations to this effect from the Australian Law Reform Commission and the NSW Ombudsman respectively. Maybe its a separation of powers, constitutional thing. But both could act to improve transparency particularly about the expenditure of public money by parliamentarians, by taking steps in Parliament to have the institution adopt rules requiring disclosure of payment of allowances and other expenditure on behalf of members. Neither government controls their upper house but I imagine the cross-benches would jump at the chance to get behind them on this.

Prompted by news from the UK over the weekend about latest developments there. Big, bad news for Prime Minister Brown acording to the Financial Times.

"The 646 MPs at Westminster are under growing pressure after the publication of receipts showing lavish and sometimes outlandish use of taxpayers? money. The deluge began after one British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, obtained details of all of the receipts for MPs? expenses submitted over four years. After an unsuccessful battle waged by politicians against freedom of information campaigners, officials had been due to publish them in July.

The revelations have shown senior ministers and backbench politicians alike milking the system to their maximum advantage even if the claims all fall within the Commons rules. MPs were found to have charged for everything from eyeliner and baby food to a bag of manure and ? in one case ? a mole catcher. Others used the cash to build up property portfolios, often changing the definition of their ?main? and ?second? homes to maximise income."

The Daily Mail has plenty more detail.

Meanwhile our lot keep heads below the parapet, although a bit of digging brings up some news from time to time, today on Parliamentary Secretary Jan McLucas.

Full post as published by Open and Shut on May 10, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0145 secs (new cache)