Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> StandDown Texas Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: StandDown Texas ProjectQuestioning Forensic Evidence
By standdown
ADVERTISEMENTS
That's the title of a column in National Law Journal written by UC-Davis Law prof Edward J. Imwinkelried. It's subtitled, "A recently released NAS report raises a host of issues."The July 28, 2008, edition of this column highlighted a pending U.S. Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts,
No. 07-591, which may have a major impact on the admissibility of
expert testimony in federal court, especially in criminal cases. Of
course, judicial decisions are not the only developments that can
affect the future of expert testimony. In February of this year, the
National Research Council of the National Academies of Science (NAS)
released a long-awaited report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward...continue to full postFull post as published by StandDown Texas Project on May 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Is Forensic Evidence Used in L.A. Murder Trials Valid
Microsoft Has a New Forensic Device for Windows Computers
Deloitte to Acquire Forensic Data Services
Kaye on Individuation, Probability, and Forensic Evidence
Easier computer searches with Microsoft's COFEE (Computer Online Forensic Evidence Extractor)







