ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Prawfs

Pardon My Language

By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel

ADVERTISEMENTS

How often do you find yourself using foul language?  Are the occurrences rare, or is your conversation rather peppered with variations on four-letter words?  How many times have you slipped up in class (whether teacher or student)?  When you hear such language, are you offended by it consistently, at times depending on context, or rarely if at all?

The Supreme Court last week upheld the FCC?s implementation of a rule permitting it to levy fines in the event of a one-time profane utterance.  The FCC rule stems from what it once called a ?fleeting and isolated? use of the F-word by Bono at the 2003 Golden Globes; the rule signaled the FCC's reversal of course on that position, on the heels of similar utterances by Cher and Nicole Ritchie. 

The decision is, to me, questionable on a couple of fronts.  The Court tabled the First Amendment issues, but in doing so left quite a bit of room for further contests.  I wonder whether the non-sexual use of a term should be punished despite a standard that prohibits just such ?context[ual]? use.  I am also curious whether the FCC?s approved position is one that is detached from conversational reality (as pointed out here and here, the Court refrained from mentioning either of the two words at issue in the case once in the decision--perhaps an indication of such detachment).  To that end, I return to the questions at the outset of this post (similar questions could be asked about standards concerning nudity; the Court today directed the Third Circuit to reconsider its decision against the levying of a hefty fine upon CBS for the Jackson/Timberlake ?wardrobe malfunction?).  Have standards changed with respect to what is thought of as indecent language (or is this guy still right)?  If so, have they changed to a degree that would warrant the FCC being more accepting of ?fleeting and isolated? uses of words (particularly words used in a non-sexual manner) rather than less?  And be honest?how many times have you slipped up in class?

Full post as published by Prawfs on May 05, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)