Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Threat LevelSupreme Court: Feds Abusing Identity Theft Law
By David Kravets
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday the government has been overstepping the boundaries of identity theft legislation when targeting immigrants who use phony citizenship documents to acquire jobs.
The 2004 legislation, which typically carries a two-year maximum term, has also been threatened against illegal immigrants in exchange for them agreeing to be deported, like the 400 illegal immigrants working under false pretenses at an Iowa meatpacking plant last year.
The justices said that the government, in order to prove such charges, must demonstrate that a defendant “knowingly” hijacked the identity of somebody else. In the case before the justices, an Illinois illegal immigrant steelworker was charged under the statute after submitting a fake Social Security number that, without the worker’s knowledge, happened to match a real number.
The Obama administration argued (.pdf) against the high court’s position.
“The Government claims more forcefully that the word ‘knowingly’ applies to all but the statute?s last three words, i.e., ‘of another person.’ The statute, the government says, does not require a prosecutor to show that the defendant knows that the means of identification the defendant has unlawfully used in fact belongs to another person. But how are we to square this reading with the statute?s language?” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote (.pdf)
Breyer said the decision would not have an impact on bread-and-butter ID theft cases. In those instances, persons hijacking someone’s identity for financial gain obviously know that such data belongs to a real person, Breyer wrote.
Photo: d70focus
See Also:
- US Identity Theft Convictions Increase 26 Percent, Feds
- Feds Offer Identity Theft Recs
- Privacy Expert on Feds’ Identity Theft Recs
- I Was a Cybercrook for the FBI
- 27B Prompts Lawmaker to Investigate Shady Site
- Data Hemorrhages in the Health-Care Sector
- National ID to Be Privatized, Activist Says He Has Docs
- Caller ID Spoofing Hearing Today
Full post as published by Threat Level on May 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Facebook
Downloading Games Linked to Possible Identity Theft
Daimler Chrysler et al.
alleged negligence pertaining to lost confidential client data which exposed customers to identity theft
Wegmans Food Market
alleging the retailer revealed too much information on their credit and debit card receipts, violating the FACTA law, and leaving customers open to identity theft
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info
Clear
Verified Identity Pass Face Class Action
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Identity Theft - Feds Tighten Online Information Rules
Aggravated Identity Theft - A Great Issue Right Now for Legal Writing Problems
Supreme Court Takes Immigrant Identity Theft Case
Supreme Court takes on identity theft case
Events #1: An "Identity Theft" Program at Rider University in Central NJ
Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Ignorance is a Defense to the Federal Crime of Identity Theft








