Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Madisonian.net
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Madisonian.netScalia?s Views of Privacy Apparently Change When His Personal Information is at Stake
By Ann Bartow
Last year, when law professor Joel Reidenberg wanted to show his Fordham University class how readily private information is available on the Internet, he assigned a group project. It was collecting personal information from the Web about himself.
This year, after U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made public comments that seemingly may have questioned the need for more protection of private information, Reidenberg assigned the same project. Except this time Scalia was the subject, the prof explains to the ABA Journal in a telephone interview.
His class turned in a 15-page dossier that included not only Scalia’s home address, home phone number and home value, but his food and movie preferences, his wife’s personal e-mail address and photos of his grandchildren, reports Above the Law.
And, as Scalia himself made clear in a statement to Above the Law, he isn’t happy about the invasion of his privacy:
“Professor Reidenberg’s exercise is an example of perfectly legal, abominably poor judgment. Since he was not teaching a course in judgment, I presume he felt no responsibility to display any,” the justice says, among other comments.
A Supreme Court spokeswoman confirmed to the ABA Journal in an e-mail that the Scalia blast to ATL “is accurately attributed to Justice Scalia.”
In response, Reidenberg tells the ABA Journal that the information gathered by his class about Scalia was all “publicly available, for free,” and wasn’t posted on the Internet by the class or otherwise further publicized. He views the dossier-gathering about a public figure as a legitimate classroom exercise intended to spark discussion about privacy law, and says he and the class didn’t intend to offend Scalia. …
Read the entire article here. There is no privacy on the Internet and Scalia invokes the gratuitously nasty “blame the messenger” response so typical of the arrogant and uninformed.
No Tags
Full post as published by Madisonian.net on April 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Storm8 Faces Class Action over Personal Information Harvesting through iPhone Games
Storm8 Faces Class Action of Personal Information Harvesting through iPhone Games
Lifeblood
alleging negligence after computers were stolen which contained personal information.
Security Breach
Check 'N Go to pay $220,000 settlement in personal information lawsuit.
FDA
Requests Labeling Change for Singulair, Accolate and Zyflo and Zyflo CR
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Walt Disney
alleging a Sikh American applied for a job with Disney but was told he did not have the "Disney look" - apparently referring to his beard and turban, which is required by his religion.

Justice Scalia's Conception of Privacy
Corey Ciocchetti on E-Commerce and Information Privacy
Justice Scalia's Dossier: Interesting Issues about Privacy and Ethics
Justice Scalia Called a "Bully":








