Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

US releases human rights pledges in anticipation of UN council vote

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

[JURIST] The US State Department released Monday its commitments and pledges as part of its campaign to gain a seat on the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). All countries attempting to be elected to the body, which holds elections every year for three-year terms, are invited to outline their national commitments to human rights and how they will further those goals internationally through the UNHRC. The US pledge, which is voluntary, contains the following commitments: 1. Commitment to advancing human rights in the UN system; 2. Commitment to continue support to human rights activities in the UN system;3. Commitment to advancing human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity and prosperity internationally; and4. Commitment to advancing human rights and fundamental freedoms in the United States.The pledge also contains monetary commitments to be made to the UN in furtherance of its human rights goals. The US has never before sought a seat on the UNHRC. Other countries likely to gain posts on the council are China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Cuba. Of those, only Cuba released a pledge. The voting, which is mostly a formality due to the lack of competition in most regions besides Eastern Europe, will take place May 12. The US announced its intent to seek a seat on the council in early April, hoping to affect more change by working from inside the council than by boycotting the effort. The UNHRC was created in 2006, at which time the Bush administration declined to seek a Council seat or participate in its proceedings. In February, human rights groups and politicians criticized the Obama administration for apparently continuing the Bush policy, after the State Department remained silent during the most recent UNHRC universal periodic review (UPR). State Department spokesperson Robert Wood defended the delegates' silence, saying that the US was not actively participating because the Obama administration was still deciding how it wanted to interact with the Council. Wood said that the US had representatives attending and monitoring the UPR sessions, and that its abstention from the reviews did not mean that human rights were not a priority for the administration.VOTE FOR JURIST JURIST is nominated for a 2009 Webby Award as best Law website. Please vote for us here!

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on April 28, 2009 (boomark / email).