ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Tampa Bay Personal Injury Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Tampa Bay Personal Injury Law

FDA Closes Major Testing Loophole

By Don Greiwe

ADVERTISEMENTS

On April 8, 2009, The Food and Drug Administration announced it would be ending loophole exploited for years by manufacturers. This loophole allowed all medical devices 'manufactured and marketed' before the Medical Device Regulation Act of 1976. This meant that manufacturers did not have to show safety or effectiveness of a wide range of products from pacemaker parts to female condoms, and were exempt from the FDA's usually scientific decisions.

The FDA classifies all medical devices into three categories: Class I (adhesive bandages and other items that pose little threat when used as intended), to Class III (pacemakers, breast implants, etc.). All Class III products must be shown to be both effective and safe before they are marketed, but those 'types' of devices already marketed before 1976 did not have to apply for FDA approval.

At the act's inception, Congress instructed the FDA to review the Class III devices subject to this loophole, but until the mid-90's few of these 'legacy devices' were actually reviewed. In 1994, there were over 150 different types of medical devices on the market which were not approved by the FDA. Today that number has been lowered to 27. This announcement affects 25 of these, while the process for the remaining two is already ongoing. Manufacturers have 120 days to send the FDA safety and effectiveness data related to the device as if they were applying for first-time approval.

Frankly, it's about time this blatant loophole is closed. Perhaps taking over 30 years to complete what Congress had asked of the FDA attests to the complexity of the matter. Or, more likely, it's another example of the FDA's bureaucracy and the medical industry's Washington lobbying.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Don Greiwe

Full post as published by Tampa Bay Personal Injury Law on April 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)