ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Jolly Lawger

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Students

: Jolly Lawger

Seasonal Adverse Possession.

By Steve Pirates

ADVERTISEMENTS

I posed a question to my 1L tutants earlier in the question regarding adverse possession of a piece of property by two seasonal users unaware of each other. I posed the question, and then refused to answer it. Apparently this was annoying to some of the students.

I did not answer the question because I have not seen a case on point, and the material is not covered in their case book, so I didn?t have a ready answer that I knew to be accurate. I also did not answer the question because I wanted them to make arguments. I wanted them to get used to the idea that in law school, it?s the argument and analysis, not the conclusion that matter.

Well, now that the semester is over, here is my personal belief on the matter. Here?s a reduced version of the prompt.

Bob owns a large hilly plot of land with a lake. He leaves one day and never comes back. In January 1950, Steve shows up and decides that the land would make a great ski spot. So he builds a ski shack and uses it as a ski playground. He leaves in April when the season is over. In June 1950, Mark shows up and decides that the land would make a great fishing spot. He sets up shop in the ski shack. Mark leaves in October when it starts to snow.

Every year thereafter, Steve shows up in October 1st to ski, and leaves February 28. Mark shows up in March 1st and leaves in Mid September..

The jurisdiction has a 30 year statutory period. It is now February 29, 2008. Steve and Mark run into one another. Bob also happens to show up. They all argue over who owns the land. They all go to court. Who wins?

My answer: Steve. Why? Because the element of exclusivity must be held against the ?true owner? for the statutory period. The clock started in January of 1950. Bob never returned in 30 years. So, Steve satisfied exclusivity against Bob.

Mark, by contrast, never satisfies the exclusivity against Steve. Once Steve became the true owner of the land in in January 1980, and was on his land, he killed Mark?s exclusivity.

What do you all think?

Full post as published by Jolly Lawger on April 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)