Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Two-Seventy-One Patent BlogWho Licenses Out Patents and Why - Business Survey From EU, Japan
By Peter Zura
According to the survey:
? About 20% of European companies and 27% of Japanese companies holding patents license out at least one of their patents to an unaffiliated partner.
? The relationship between size and probability to license out among patent holding companies is U-shaped: the smallest ones and the largest ones are more often involved in licensing out than medium-sized ones.
? The highest proportion of firms license-out in Europe is found in the UK, followed by Nordic countries.
? Earning revenue is the major motivation for licensing out, followed by sharing technology with other companies. ?Constrained licensing? (pressuring alleged infringers to take a license) is also important in Europe.
? Cross-licensing out is the second motive for licensing out, both in Europe and in Japan: that shows a role played by patents in technology exchanges between companies.
? About 24% of firms in Europe declare having patents that they would be willing to license out but could not (53% of firms in Japan). The figures are higher within licensing companies and still higher among small firms. The major reason for this failure, according to the European and Japanese surveys, is the difficulty in identifying a partner.
? The use of patents for raising funds is recognised as very important by many European firms, notably for venture capital (11%) and private equity (13%). This rating is much higher for young firms (31% and 40% respectively).
Read/download the paper here (link)
Full post as published by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog on April 20, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mining Licenses
Gecamines awarded $2 million settlement.
Express Scripts Inc.
Over $9.5 million payout in deceptive business practices lawsuit.
FedEx
Ground Business Model Wins Class Action in Washington
Business Lawsuit
Elbit Imaging Ltd. agrees to pay CP Holdings Ltd. a $5 million settlement.
Personal Business
Jundts to pay $1.8 million settlement in debts lawsuit.
Tagged.com Sued over Deceptive Business Practices
Tagged.com Faces Potential Class Action

Will business method patents be put out of business
Estate Planning Business Booms in Japan
UK-IPO Patent Litigation Survey









