Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Federal Civil Practice BulletinProf. Dodson Posts Article on Comparative Pleading Standards
Comparative civil procedure has had little influence in American jurisprudence and commentary, in part because of American procedure's deep and widespread exceptionalism. But this may be changing, at least in certain areas. The American notice pleading standard, for example, which has long been considered exceptional, shows signs of trending toward the fact pleading models of foreign countries. Congressional experimentation with heightened pleading in statutes such as the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and the Supreme Court's recent pronouncement in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly suggest that American pleading jurisprudence is moving away from its traditionally exceptionalist corner and towards a regime focused on facts that is more akin to the global norm. If so, then this trend may allow for more meaningful transnational dialogue between the U.S. and foreign systems, more valuable comparative analyses in the U.S., and the potential to harmonize civil procedure across national boundaries.
This Article may be downloaded by visiting http://ssrn.com/abstract=1351994.
Full post as published by Federal Civil Practice Bulletin on April 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Pleading and the Dilemmas of "General Rules"
Bell Atlantic v Twombly -- the death of notice pleading
"Do Differences in Pleading Standards Cause Forum Shopping in Securities Class Actions"
Pleading Civil Rights Claims Post-Conley








