Academic

Green on American Legal Realism & Naturalized Jurisprudence

By Lawrence Solum

Leslie Green (University of Oxford - Faculty of Law) has posted Law and the Causes of Judicial Decisions on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This paper tests Brian Leiter's claim that the American legal realists were proto-naturalists in legal philosophy and were therefore immune to objections based on claims that they offered defective analyses of legal concepts. It disputes Leiter's account of the core claim of American realist thought, and reaffirms the view that some of them were engaged in, or presupposed, conceptual work of a kind familiar to analytic jurisprudence. It explains how those who did not intend to offer conceptual analyses nonetheless made conceptual errors. It offers a fresh account of the basis of realist scepticism, deploying the idea of 'permissive sources' of law. The paper concludes with general reflections on the preconditions and prospects for 'naturalizing' jurisprudence, suggesting that Hans Kelsen was correct to think that such efforts are likely to change the subject

This is a fascinating and important paper. My highest recommendation.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on April 13, 2009 (boomark / email).