Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: Law Department ManagementA fixed-fee arrangement, for environmental litigation, and some of advantages and worries
By Rees Morrison
In 2004, after eight rounds of a competitive bid run by eLawForum, Unocal chose Howrey to handle its entire environmental caseload through 2009 on a fixed fee. Litigation 2005 spells out the details of this arrangement. At the time, the average case took three year to resolve, cost $500,000 in legal fees, and resulted in resolution costs in the single digit millions of dollars. The General Counsel of Unocal at the time, Samuel Gillespie, estimated that "Unocal will save $160 million in legal fees and resolution costs for the 200 matters predicted to arise under the five-year contract." Howrey and Unocal would split any savings if Howrey managed to bring in matters under the company?s cost target.
The article surveys the pros and cons of fixed fee arrangements. ?General counsel worry that they'll commit to paying a fixed fee for cases that might settle immediately or potential litigation that never materializes." They fret that fixed fees might reduce the incentive for outside counsel to litigate vigorously. Law firms worried that clients might take advantage of their fixed fee and treat it as an "all-you-can-eat buffet."
Advantages, however, do accrue to fixed fee arrangements. In-house lawyers can bring in outside counsel more often and earlier, which increases the chances for a quicker and cheaper resolution. Also, fixed fees "free outside lawyers from the need to press clients with their thoroughness." Results count, not a willingness to invest late nights and weekends. Additionally, ?Fixed fees eliminate the nagging suspicions that firms secretly relish their clients bad fortune." The deals also provide a negotiating edge in settlements, because plaintiffs counsel knows legal costs are no longer a factor for the defendant. Finally, partners can staff matters as they see fit, including letting associates cut their teeth on real cases.
Full post as published by Law Department Management on April 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
Environmental Pollution
Asarco LLC pays $14 million for contamination settlements.
Emerson Power, BorgWarner, Burns Int.
Face Environmental Class Action
Chrysler, Behr
Face Environmental Class Action over Dayton Plant
Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold
Face Class Action Over Health and Environmental Concerns at Blackwell

Nollkaemper on Transboundary Environmental Cluster Litigation
Law - "Are Contingency-Fee Arrangement Between an Attorney General and a Private Law Firm Illegal"
Innovative Billing Arrangements Across The Pond
Share Your Law Student Worries, Win $10,000
"AOL still enjoys many advantages that most companies can only dream about"









