Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizCAFC denies mandamus in Cypress Semiconductor
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The bottom line from the CAFC: To decide the question presented by this mandamus petition, we need only decide whether Cypress
has shown that the Commission clearly and indisputably erred in ruling that the
Commission may proceed with its investigation. We determine that Cypress has not
met its burden and thus deny the petition.
There were also issues of "which law" would be applied. Federal Circuit
law prevailed here.
Full post as published by IPBiz on April 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Appeals court ruling may curb trade secret litigation
Aggressive IP Strategy Fails -- Again
CAFC Refuses Mandamus to Stay ITC Proceeding Pending Reexamination
Cypress Personal Injury and Car Accident Lawyers
D.C.Circuit - EPA's delay on regulating CO2 is just alright with us








