Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsIn re Kubin (Fed. Cir. 2009)
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Kevin E. Noonan -- The sky isn't falling. But it's becoming increasingly clear that when the Supreme Court sneezes, the Federal Circuit gets a cold (if not pneumonia). And the questions continue about whether the Federal Circuit as currently constituted has the institutional fortitude to exercise its Congressional mandate to harmonize patent law in this country. The case, of course, raising these issues anew is In re Kubin, decided on Friday. In its decision, the Federal Circuit not only affirmed the finding by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that Kubin's invention was obvious, but in the process...Full post as published by Patent Docs on April 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Obvious to Try BIO Challenges Ex Parte Kubin
Patent Docs post on Kubin, for which oral argument is Jan. 8
Federal Circuit hears arguments in In re Kubin; what will be obvious in biotechnology
Kubin decided: Federal Circuit provides guidance for application of KSR in biotechnology







