ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Illinois Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Illinois Lawyer Blog

$20 MILLION DOLLAR SETTLEMENT FOR CHILD INJURED IN FALL AT BURGER KING

By Mark P. Loftus, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

images.jpg

7F7D32B3FC400927B6EFE125B8.jpg


Recently saw an interesting article about a multi-million dollar settlement resulting from devastating injuries suffered by a little boy at a Burger King restuarant in Southern California. Back in August of 2005, Jacob Buckett,[pictured below, before the incident] then only 8, accompanied his dad and younger sister to lunch at a Burger King in Temecula, California. The particular restuarant they chose had an attached play area, with a jungle gym[known as "soft-contained playgrounds" - like the one in the photo above]. Jacob went to play on the Jungle Gym and climbed up one of the horizontal support poles. He lost his balance and fell, cracking his head on the tile floor.

Jacob suffered a traumatic brain injury which kept him in a coma for two months. He was hospitalized for a full six months. The brain damage he suffered left him partially paralyzed and with severe emotional and cognitive defects. Although Jacob is now 12, he has the maturity level of a 6 year old.

Jacob's parents sued, claiming that the franchise owner, The Breckenridge Group, and the parent company, Burger King, knew the Jungle Gym was dangerous, but didn't address the problems. Specifically, the Bucketts argued that the play area lacked "no-climb netting" and floor padding. They further alleged that the defendants were on notice about these defects because of previous incidents. The Bucketts also alleged that the owner of the franchise, failed to post warning signs and refused to retrofit the structure.

The article suggested that the defendants in their responsive pleadings suggested the Jacob's father was at least partly responsible for failing to properly supervise the child. That assertion was neutralized by videotapes showing numerous children misusing the equipment on a regular basis prior to Jacob's accident.

The parties settled the case for $20 million, which will pay for enormous and on-going medical bills, rehabilitation therapy and 24 hour attendant care for Jacob.

humesummer.jpg

Full post as published by Illinois Lawyer Blog on April 03, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0216 secs (new cache)