ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> CL&P Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: CL&P Blog

The Need to Protect Whistleblowers in Light of Newspaper Layoffs

By Paul Levy

ADVERTISEMENTS

by Paul Alan Levy

There is an interesting discussion about the impact of the Internet (and the economic downturn) on the ability of the press to conduct in-depth investigations, and hence of the need to protect whistleblowers, in today?s Fourth Circuit ruling  about whether the First Amendment protects a police official?s leaking to the Baltimore Sun of an internal memo addressing at a coverup of complaint wrongdoing in connection with a shooting of a citizen by the police department?s tactical squad.  Public Citizen had argued as amicus curiae in the case. A statement by my colleague Bonnie Robin-Vergeer on the ruling is here.

The case was about whether the so-called Garcetti rule, which took away First Amendment protection for speech by public employees expressed in the course of their job responsibilities, extended to the public leaking of a memo send within the Department.  Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, in a three page concurring opinion, addressed the issue in the context of cutbacks in the staffs of newsgathering organizations, and speculates about ?whether the Internet and the online ventures of traditional journalistic enterprises? can fill this void; ?whether the web ? or other forms of modern media ? can replicate the deep sourcing and accumulated insights of the seasoned beat reporter,? and :whether niche publications and proliferating siters and outlets cam provide the community focus on governmental shortcomings that professional and independent metropolitan dailies have historically brought to bear.  Judge Wilkinson  ? himself a former newspaper editor ? obviously has his doubts, and argues that there is, therefore, an especial need to protect whistleblowers against retaliation.  "It seems inimical to First Amendment principles to treat too summarily those who bring, often at some personal risk, the operations of the state] into public view." 

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on April 02, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0209 secs (new cache)