ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

In-House Counsel

: Law Department Management

In-house lawyers and use of ?client? compared to ?business partner? (and ?customer?)

By Rees Morrison

ADVERTISEMENTS

Most in-house lawyers, I would wager, refer to fellow employees who seek their legal advice as ?clients.? Others, a much smaller number, vociferously reject that term. They perceive themselves as working together with fellow employees on a team and disavow some of the implications of the term ?client? (See my post of Sept. 25, 2008: MetLife refers to ?business partners?; and Oct. 8, 2007: banish the word ?client?.). Perhaps one of those implications is that in-house lawyers are less familiar with the business and less enablers of it when in a client relationship. Other differences occur to me.

Clients pay. Clients come to in-house lawyers, as clients come to law firms, but few pay for the services. At least not directly. It is the small minority of clients who receive bills from the law department for hours worked and actually transfer funds internally (See my post of Nov. 22, 2008: charge backs of internal lawyer time with 8 references.). http://www.lawdepartmentmanagementblog.com/law_department_management/2008/11/the-debate-on-whether-to-track-and-charge-back-time-to-clients.html

Attorney-client privilege. Clients are entitled to the attorney-client privilege, an important right forsaken if lawyers take business decisions (See my post of Feb. 16, 2008: attorney-client privilege with 18 references.).

Partnership. Clients are not truly partners. No one contributes capital, no one is promoted, no one shares in profits and losses.

Voluntary. Clients have no choice but to use the in-house legal team, whereas you pick your team. Then again, even ?business associates? still have to use the in-house group rather than blithely go outside.

As I see it, neither ?clients? nor ?partners? are ?customers? of a legal department, even though some legal teams use that term (See my post of Dec. 21, 2005: Philipps? law department pursues ?customer alignment?; and April 15, 2006: Adobe?s general counsel used the term.). Customers come to an establishment and purchase something. Often, they receive no counseling, unlike getting training or advice from a lawyer; money always changes hands; and establishments want more and more customers. I use the term ?customer? for those who do business with the company of the law department (See my post of Dec. 9, 2008: document assembly helps customers.).

Full post as published by Law Department Management on March 31, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/06/26 21:53:25)