Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Womble Trade Secrets Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Womble Trade Secrets BlogTrade Secrets All in the Head
By Press
From the Associated Press, via Dayton, Ohio television station, WDTN:
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled yesterday that memorizing a company's trade secrets is just as wrong as writing them down or copying them in some other format.
The court unanimously ordered a former employee of Al Minor & Associates to pay damages for memorizing a client list. The company sued Robert Martin, a pension analyst, when he left to start his own company in 2003. Martin was accused of taking 15 clients with him whose names he recalled from memory.
Justice Terrence O'Donnell said in the ruling that employees who leave their jobs inevitably have casual memories of contacts and things that occurred during their employment.
But he said that information is not protected.
For the more scholarly-minded, we are providing a link to the Ohio Supreme Court's opinion here.
Full post as published by Womble Trade Secrets Blog on February 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Michelin hit with $11.9M verdict for fatal head on crash
Michelin Settles Lawsuit for $11.6 Million

West Legal Education Center Trade Secrets Courses
Think Secrets trade secrets case
Jorda on: The Importance of Trade Secrets
Jorda on: The Complementariness of Patents and Trade Secrets
Jorda on: The Criticality of Trade Secrets in Technology Licensing and Tech Transfer








